Les archives du Forum Catholique
Forum | Documents | Liens | Q.F.P. | Oremus

Les archives du Forum Catholique

JUIN 2001 A JUILLET 2003

Retour à la liste des messages | Rechercher

Afficher le fil complet

Le cal Medina et les évêques italiens Imprimer
Auteur : Justin Petipeu
Sujet : Le cal Medina et les évêques italiens
Date : 2003-06-05 10:22:06

Dans le dernier numéro de "The Latin Mass", le cardinal Medina est interviewé. Extrait :

**Q. Cardinal Ratzinger recently wrote that the Church has never forbidden
any orthodox forms of liturgy. Did the Church ever ban the rite of St. Pius
V, which was for centuries the official rite of the Church?



**A. I studied carefully the question of the abrogation of the rite of St.
Pius V after Vatican Council II. I'm a close friend of Cardinal Ratzinger, a great theologian and churchman whom I've known and admired since 1962, and to whom I'm grateful for his profound liturgical insights. On the basis of my research, I cannot conclude that the rite of St. Pius V was ever abrogated. Some think it was. Others take a different view. And so, as the Latin goes, in dubiis, libertas [where there is doubt, there is freedom].

Later, Cardinal Medina was asked about the possibility of the traditional
Rite co-existing along with the Novus Ordo:

**A. Personally, I don't particularly see any difficulty. There are already
instances when certain celebrations outside liturgical norms enjoy at least a tacit approval, and so I see no problem with a four-century-old [sic] rite, which is also thoroughly orthodox.



Deux lettres d'évêques itlaiens en réponse à des demandes d'indult :

. The bishop of Pisa,
H.E. Alessandro Plotti, writes:

"I wish to tell you that my refusal to grant such an indult is absolute and
irrevocable. As bishop and pastor of this local church I don't see any valid
ecclesial and pastoral reason why I should authorize the celebration of a
Mass which may cause confusion and division among the People of God. It
would be better for you to take a more constructive and positive attitude
toward discovering the treasure and the many opportunities of ministry and
community life which the liturgical reform [sic] of Vatican II brought about
in the conscience of the People of God."

His colleague in Sassari, H.E. Paolo Atzei, writes:

"I'll never be the one in the diocese would would ever allow a return to
pre-Vatican II, as you yourself and perhaps others in the diocese are
looking for; nor would I ever permit in my diocese the celebration [of Mass]
according to that Missal [of St. Pius V]. You need to walk in the Church. as
a Church, with the Church for her Spouse and Lord Jesus Christ."



La discussion

      Le cal Medina et les évêques italiens, de Justin Petipeu [2003-06-05 10:22:06]
          Hé hé hé !, de Michel R [2003-06-05 10:34:08]
              Re : Hé hé hé !, de Wonder (195.93.72.xxx) [2003-06-05 12:22:31]
                  Interdira tout quoi ? [NT], de Michel R [2003-06-05 14:44:04]
                  Et toc ! [NT], de Patrice (212.96.72.xxx) [2003-06-05 22:57:02]
                  - pdt -, de XA [2003-06-05 22:59:13]
          Grrr..., de Matthieu (80.9.224.xxx) [2003-06-05 10:34:16]
          Plus intéressante, de Justin Petipeu [2003-06-05 10:50:43]
              Pardon, de Justin Petipeu [2003-06-05 10:51:37]
              Juste, mais, de Michel R [2003-06-05 10:59:15]
                  Et combien seront morts dans 5/10 ans? [NT], de NB (194.117.217.xxx) [2003-06-05 11:18:33]
                      Re :Et combien seront morts dans 5/10 ans? [NT] [N [...], de Adso (212.234.180.xxx) [2003-06-05 11:22:03]
                  Un nouveau schisme ?, de Edouard [2003-06-05 11:31:11]
                      Re : Un nouveau schisme ?, de geronimo (195.93.72.xxx) [2003-06-05 14:10:39]
                          Définition, de Edouard [2003-06-05 14:21:54]
                              Exact, de geronimo (195.93.74.xxx) [2003-06-05 14:40:17]
                                  Et vice-versa, de Edouard [2003-06-05 14:45:51]
                                      Exactement, de geronimo (195.93.72.xxx) [2003-06-05 15:00:15]
                              Re : Définition, de Wonder (195.93.74.xxx) [2003-06-05 14:54:34]
                                  Dieu seul le sait.... [NT], de geronimo (195.93.72.xxx) [2003-06-05 15:01:01]
                                  Curieuse méthode, de Edouard [2003-06-05 15:01:52]
                                      Justin n'est pas saint ????? [NT], de Michel R [2003-06-05 15:24:38]
                                          Meuh si, de Justin Petipeu [2003-06-05 16:20:58]
                                              api beuuuuuurrrzdêê touillouuuu ! [NT], de Michel R [2003-06-05 16:42:36]
                                                  Merci, de Justin Petipeu [2003-06-06 12:49:31]
                                              Re : Meuh si, de Wonder (195.93.72.xxx) [2003-06-05 17:20:41]
                                                  Est catholique :, de Tintin (212.71.26.xxx) [2003-06-05 17:41:55]
                                                  Qui est catholique ?, de Grégoire (212.96.72.xxx) [2003-06-05 23:05:52]
                                                      200 000 catholiques, de Marc B (213.36.235.xxx) [2003-06-07 09:40:49]
                                                          et encore..., de Pothin [2003-06-07 21:24:09]
                          Re : Un nouveau schisme ?, de Dickès Jean-Pierre [2003-06-05 19:25:35]
                          Elle l'est déjà, ne vous en dé [...], de PGM (216.162.67.xxx) [2003-06-06 02:06:12]
          référence pour les évêq [...], de Loïc Mérian [2003-06-05 14:14:42]
              Una Vox Italia, de Matthieu [2003-06-05 21:09:50]